Is Vaping Health Risky?
The author examines the possible social and health advantages of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She refers to e-cigarettes as electric cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the various possibilities for teens in light of the fact that smoking has turned into a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that people should consider the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also taking into consideration the dangers of nicotine addiction. The writer also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I agree with her that e-cigarette vaporizers certainly are a harmless option to smoking, if used correctly.
The majority of the data on smoking and its risks comes from adults, and this helps it be hard to assess how the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It is estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths every year are because of smoking. This figure is likely an underestimation, because so many deaths may be the result of second hand smoke. It also assumes that people who smoke don’t plan to achieve this.
The writer suggests that we should think about the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the effect of tobacco products, while providing a much less harmful experience. The problem with this approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking is to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that folks who use the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that originates from this is that because e smokers don’t feel any of the Vape Pen physical effects of smoking, they can not be deemed to be causing these deaths, if they are.
However, it’s important to remember that smoking and using vaporizers are both very similar behaviors. Why is vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to find the same effect as smoking, minus the associated risks. Vaporizing offers a highly similar experience as smoking. This means that vapers could be increasing their chances of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they are taking steps in the direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the chance of enjoying a healthier lifestyle.
The author makes some valid points about the dangers of smoking cigarettes. He also makes some valid criticisms of the lack of nicotine, and of the dangers of carbon monoxide smoke. However, his real issue is one of regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies shouldn’t be permitted to advertise their products as safe when all they have done is increase the level of chemicals and additives that are present in traditional cigarettes. The issue with this argument is that we have already seen the negative effects of increased levels of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We curently have countless reports about the negative side effects of nicotine, especially in smokers trying to quit. We already have plenty of stories concerning the rise of cancers and respiratory problems caused by long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been a key point in the spike in smoking-related deaths over the past couple of years.
The author does not may actually recognize the irony of arguing against smoking by way of a healthier alternative, but doesn’t appear to consider the potential negative health effects of his product either. He also discounts the idea that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually reverse to cigarette smoking. He seems to think that all we have to do to beat cigarettes would be to reduce the amount of nicotine we take in. The fact is that smokers who make an effort to quit often do so due to other medical issues, and aren’t just turning to the cigarettes to get from their bad habits. There are lots of reasons why people smoke. The writer has basically ignored all of them in his arguments against vaping.
While it is true that the cigarettes do not contain any real tobacco, a few of the chemicals found in using tobacco are located in the smokes. The author seems to be of the fact that all we have to do to solve the problem of smoking is to decrease the amount of chemicals we ingest through our lungs. The argument he presents is simply not located in sound scientific fact. There is absolutely no real proof that reducing the quantity of chemicals we ingest improves anything other than our health and wellness. The author also discounts the theory that the cigarettes are less hazardous than regular cigarettes since they don’t contain the harmful chemicals found in regular cigarettes.